so the method has to be autonomous

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

not their contents

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

magnetisation/form

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

isaac newton

i understand

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

...

i love it here

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

you cannot feed someone truth

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

ion

which magnetises chains of pins

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

have you read

god being the centre magnet

Thank you, Jack

i dont understand magnetisation