i dont understand magnetisation

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

what do you mean

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

have you read

i understand

which magnetises chains of pins

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

god being the centre magnet

autonomy of learning

sorry i am texting like a slav

much more tactility

feel you

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

so an active mazelike process

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

magnetises a pin

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

you cannot feed someone truth

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

its performative

or never left

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

abrar?

thank you

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i love it here