in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

no i haven't really read anything

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

god being the centre magnet

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

we can only engage in such a way

so an active mazelike process

plato

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

plato

its good

i love it here

division of reality is straying away from it

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

idk

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

i was tempted to lie about my name

its good

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

its good short few pages

whats your name?

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

ahnaf abrar

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate