i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

its good short few pages

not their contents

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

its performative

so at the end

so the method has to be autonomous

idk

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i understand

as in

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

barren land

propensity within someone

god being the centre magnet

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

i was tempted to lie about my name

was it worth it

magnetisation/form

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

autonomy of learning

whats your name?

what do you think my name is

i love it here

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:27:13

abrar?

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

fw

feel you

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

it is hopeful