think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i really havent
...
wait what is that
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
was it worth it
you cannot feed someone truth
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
not so on: yvf(wthw)
magnetisation/form
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
its performative
so an active mazelike process
so the method has to be autonomous
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
...
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
sorry i am texting like a slav
its good short few pages
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
much more tactility
hello reader,