i really havent
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
you cannot feed someone truth
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
division of reality is straying away from it
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
all that is to say
no like which do people call me
autonomy of learning
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
not their contents
lol yea
what do you think my name is
feel you
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.much more tactility
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
its good
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it
or never left