i want to do that too

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

so at the end

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

so the method has to be autonomous

or never left

much more tactility

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

bro i read nothing in my life

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

lol

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

what do you mean

whats your name?

i dont understand magnetisation

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

like first name

autonomy of learning

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

i was tempted to lie about my name

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

lol yea

propensity within someone

its good short few pages

i really havent

we need to be deconstructing our identities

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

we can only engage in such a way

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation