there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.
yeah
was it worth it
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
not their contents
as in
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
you cannot feed someone truth
We stand there laughing. The fireworks go off behind him.
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
so the method has to be autonomous
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
i dont understand magnetisation
propensity within someone
i understand
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
like first name
ahnaf abrar
division of reality is straying away from it
Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:
magnetisation/form
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.
have you read