lol

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

as in

all that is to say

is this you as well

idk

magnetisation/form

yeah

what do you think my name is

ahnaf abrar

much more tactility

i dont understand magnetisation

thank you

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

feel you

so at the end

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i was tempted to lie about my name

no i haven't really read anything

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

which magnetises chains of pins

and the fake qualifier

not their contents

so an active mazelike process

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

like first name

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

plato

that looks like my instagram account

no like which do people call me

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

its good short few pages

have you read

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

and the fake qualifier