there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

not their contents

its performative

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

we need to be deconstructing our identities

i really havent

feel you

you cannot feed someone truth

plato

much more tactility

magnetisation/form

i dont understand magnetisation

ion

i understand

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

is everyoneback on tumblr now

its good

isaac

i was tempted to lie about my name

Lift Analysis

not so on: yvf(wthw)

⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

...

The bird dives back into the tree. It shakes, some leaves fall.

"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.

I created this site