so at the end

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

have you read

lol

not their contents

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

hiding from the rain

its good short few pages

but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

you cannot feed someone truth

bro i read nothing in my life

you have a beautiful account btw

i really havent

She closes the window. I wasn't paying attention anyway, I'm getting cold, and the birds are nowhere to be seen. I go inside.

really i want the internet

god being the centre magnet

yeah

so the method has to be autonomous

ion

"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

confused - is it the tide or its absense? I still like where I was going with it. anyway, real reader know this site is the note.

like magnets