ahnaf abrar
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
which magnetises chains of pins
its good
idk
so the method has to be autonomous
its good
ion
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
sorry i am texting like a slav
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
plato
whats your name?
have you read
autonomy of learning
all that is to say
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
that looks like my instagram account
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
like first name
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
as in
you cannot feed someone truth
and the fake qualifier
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.