magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

as in

so at the end

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

sorry i am texting like a slav

lol

i have read not even 1 book

i was tempted to lie about my name

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

not their contents

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

so an active mazelike process

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

we need to be deconstructing our identities

plato

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

that looks like my instagram account

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

fw

She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.

idk

yeah

like first name

its good