isaac

lol yea

much more tactility

autonomy of learning

all that is to say

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

that looks like my instagram account

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting


i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

like magnets

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

so at the end

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

its good short few pages

thank you

and the fake qualifier

so an active mazelike process

plato

i was tempted to lie about my name

no like which do people call me


and so on. not wanting the rhyming / clanging

December 2025

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.

i understand

division of reality is straying away from it

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

what do you mean

its good

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything