lol yea
much more tactility
autonomy of learning
all that is to say
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
that looks like my instagram account
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
like magnets
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
so at the end
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
its good short few pages
thank you
and the fake qualifier
so an active mazelike process
plato
i was tempted to lie about my name
no like which do people call me
December 2025
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.i understand
division of reality is straying away from it
what do you mean
its good
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything