much more tactility
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
yeah
all that is to say
so the method has to be autonomous
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
you cannot feed someone truth
its performative
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
its good
god being the centre magnet
that looks like my instagram account
propensity within someone
not their contents
we can only engage in such a way
which magnetises chains of pins
division of reality is straying away from it
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
plato
i love it here
so at the end
we need to be deconstructing our identities
as in
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.
i dont understand magnetisation
I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.