i understand
lol yea
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
all that is to say
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
not their contents
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
its good short few pages
as in
magnetises a pin
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
division of reality is straying away from it
i want to do that too
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
lol
its good
Thank you, Jack
He went in there with a camera to film it before he moved out of the building. He didn't think anyone would believe the story if he didn't have proof.
thank you
was it worth it
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
you cannot feed someone truth
no like which do people call me
we can only engage in such a way
no i haven't really read anything
which magnetises chains of pins