way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
we need to be deconstructing our identities
is everyoneback on tumblr now
bro i read nothing in my life
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
is this you as well
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
no like which do people call me
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
abrar?
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
as in
whats your name?
division of reality is straying away from it
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
magnetises a pin
yeah
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
so at the end
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
They're fucking around with the box. I ask her what people do with fireworks for so long before they're ready to light. She doesn't know.
so an active mazelike process
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
He went in there with a camera to film it before he moved out of the building. He didn't think anyone would believe the story if he didn't have proof.
isaac newton
so the method has to be autonomous
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.