a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext

is this you as well

isaac newton

not their contents

have you read

Mon, 01 Dec 2025 23:38:15

abrar?

was it worth it

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

we can only engage in such a way

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

idk

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i dont understand magnetisation

its good

your feed looks like my tumblr

autonomy of learning

you cannot feed someone truth

magnetisation/form

as in

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

like first name

kind of mythopoesis

i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me

god being the centre magnet

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying