okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
have you read
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
so the method has to be autonomous
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
autonomy of learning
so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
magnetisation/form
division of reality is straying away from it
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
it is hopeful
really i want the internet
no i haven't really read anything
propensity within someone
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
no like which do people call me
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
Lift Analysis
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me
you cannot feed someone truth
we want to live the knowledge too live the content