and the fake qualifier
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
what do you think my name is
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
you cannot feed someone truth
like first name
feel you
not their contents
so the method has to be autonomous
plato
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
we need to be deconstructing our identities
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
whats your name?
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
god being the centre magnet
which magnetises chains of pins
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
its good
propensity within someone
plato
ahnaf abrar
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
have you read