the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

sorry i am texting like a slav

much more tactility

like magnets

isaac

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

what do you mean

i have read not even 1 book

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

all that is to say

god being the centre magnet

magnetises a pin

so at the end

i understand

so an active mazelike process

which magnetises chains of pins

isaac newton

i love it here

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

plato

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

you cannot feed someone truth

i dont understand magnetisation

feel you

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

ahnaf abrar

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

yeah

have you read

i was tempted to lie about my name

Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.