my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
idk
propensity within someone
i dont understand magnetisation
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
abrar?
fw
lol
what do you think my name is
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever
we need to be deconstructing our identities
Better Lift
whats your name?
i was tempted to lie about my name
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
what do you mean
yeah
so the method has to be autonomous
it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful
is this you as well
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
Their voices are saying they haven't and shouldn't fuck but want to so bad, or have fucked and can't again but want to so bad, or something like that. Would this be easier if they were birds? Incel kind of question... I'm not following the conversation, but I'm still listening. He's talking in this slightly begging way. It's a way of talking that asks for pity, like he's already tried appealing to every other one of her sensibilities. Incel kind of observation... Maybe he just talks like that, in some upspeak derivative. Haha unless?
sorry i am texting like a slav
like magnets
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
and the fake qualifier
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.bro i read nothing in my life