ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

barren land

is everyoneback on tumblr now

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

not their contents

we can only engage in such a way

your feed looks like my tumblr

have you read

i dont understand magnetisation

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

ion

fw

so the method has to be autonomous

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

thank you

i understand

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

its good

or never left

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

isaac

all that is to say

autonomy of learning

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

isaac newton

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

its performative

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

not so on: yvf(wthw)

what do you mean

yeah