abrar?

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

like first name

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

or never left

is this you as well

bro i read nothing in my life

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

i really havent

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

have you read

so at the end

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

god being the centre magnet

and the fake qualifier

idk

send your tumblr

magnetises a pin

division of reality is straying away from it

autonomy of learning

feel you

we can only engage in such a way

barren land

all that is to say

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i was tempted to lie about my name

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

yeah

i have read not even 1 book