She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
was it worth it
god being the centre magnet
no like which do people call me
abrar?
bro i read nothing in my life
lol yea
i really havent
barren land
isaac
autonomy of learning
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
lol
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
so at the end
all that is to say
its good short few pages
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
plato
or never left
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation