i dont understand magnetisation

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

division of reality is straying away from it



Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.

...


...

...

and so on. not wanting the rhyming / clanging

not so on: yvf(wthw)

I Write Goodbye Letter

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

all that is to say

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

magnetisation/form

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation


to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

really i want the internet

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

its performative

much more tactility

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things