i really havent
like magnets
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
like first name
was it worth it
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
lol
plato
no i haven't really read anything
all that is to say
much more tactility
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
not their contents
so at the end
autonomy of learning
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
its good
have you read
send link
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
so an active mazelike process
isaac
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
idk