was it worth it
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
its good
i understand
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
autonomy of learning
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
have you read
lol
you cannot feed someone truth
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
no i haven't really read anything
and the fake qualifier
its good short few pages
feel you
its performative
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
wait what is that
and the fake qualifier
i love it here
isaac
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
which magnetises chains of pins
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i want to do that too
but really the thing should be autonomous
what do you think my name is