i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

you cannot feed someone truth

its performative

so the method has to be autonomous

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

Better Lift

Lift Analysis

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

you have a beautiful account btw

propensity within someone

brb i will read and reply sincerely

i see a website

currently

Thank you, Jack

no longer writing in the third person

She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.