okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

and the fake qualifier

as in

i love it here

you cannot feed someone truth

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

ahnaf abrar

not their contents

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

what do you think my name is

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

send your tumblr

so at the end

autonomy of learning

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

Picture

we can only engage in such a way

plato

bro i read nothing in my life

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

Lift Analysis

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them