okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

and so on. not wanting the rhyming / clanging

yeah

much more tactility

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

so an active mazelike process

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

yeah

i want to do that too

we need to be deconstructing our identities

abrar?

we can only engage in such a way

that looks like my instagram account

its performative

i am quite illiterate on producing technology

idk

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

plato

send your tumblr

your feed looks like my tumblr

whats your name?

its good

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

you cannot feed someone truth