i dont understand magnetisation

and the fake qualifier

plato

ahnaf abrar

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

barren land

is this you as well

what do you mean

its good

magnetisation/form

not their contents

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

plato

we can only engage in such a way

abrar?

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

like first name

i love to walk around and see things and take photos and go online and look at websites and click on links and take screenshots i love to surf and i love to browse

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

It Will Get Lighter

so the method has to be autonomous

so an active mazelike process

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

was it worth it

i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me

1

the point of this was to try and avoid this narcissistic death spiral I'm in by acting anonymously and impulsively. how can that feeling that even Jack can't describe paralyse me if my name isn't next to any of this? the excitement of believing I just need a new process has overcome me and I have cummed out an empty webpage.

ion

i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i am quite illiterate on producing technology

i was tempted to lie about my name

a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext

sorry i am texting like a slav