the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

we need to be deconstructing our identities

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

plato

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

magnetisation/form

no like which do people call me

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

autonomy of learning

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

yeah

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

isaac

thank you

i was tempted to lie about my name

not their contents

like first name

god being the centre magnet

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

i want to do that too

bro i read nothing in my life

yeah

sorry i am texting like a slav

ion

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

so the method has to be autonomous

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

all that is to say