okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
yeah
barren land
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
lol
division of reality is straying away from it
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
autonomy of learning
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
we can only engage in such a way
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
its performative
so the method has to be autonomous
magnetisation/form
as in
send your tumblr
abrar?
Thank you, Jack
ahnaf abrar
isaac newton
your feed looks like my tumblr