god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

autonomy of learning

as in

all that is to say

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

the site i am dreaming

or never left

we can only engage in such a way

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

division of reality is straying away from it

bro i read nothing in my life

idk

was it worth it

fw

We look out over the river to a block of luxury flats built on the site of some old docks. It would be nice to live right there. Yes.

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

...

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

magnetisation/form