barren land

not their contents

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

its performative

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

its good

autonomy of learning

magnetisation/form

isaac newton

the textwall is as much for me as it is for you

i really havent

you cannot feed someone truth

god being the centre magnet

whats your name?

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i am quite illiterate on producing technology

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine

yeah

send link