like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
ahnaf abrar
what do you think my name is
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
thank you
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
you cannot feed someone truth
as in
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
its good
propensity within someone
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
fw
autonomy of learning
which magnetises chains of pins
so the method has to be autonomous
not so on: yvf(wthw)
lol yea
barren land
isaac
its good