so at the end

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

not their contents

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

plato

plato

its good short few pages

so the method has to be autonomous

all that is to say

is this you as well

propensity within someone

lol

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

autonomy of learning

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

abrar?

i really havent

so an active mazelike process

whats your name?

i have read not even 1 book

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

magnetisation/form

as in

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

no like which do people call me

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

like magnets