there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
barren land
so the method has to be autonomous
its good
no i haven't really read anything
like magnets
we can only engage in such a way
thank you
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
isaac
lol yea
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
its good short few pages
its performative
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
which magnetises chains of pins
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
plato
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
that looks like my instagram account
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
i want to do that too
i was tempted to lie about my name
is this you as well
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
send your tumblr
i dont understand magnetisation
propensity within someone
not their contents
"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting