not so on: yvf(wthw)
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i have read not even 1 book
that looks like my instagram account
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
division of reality is straying away from it
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
i want to do that too
magnetises a pin
what do you think my name is
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
thank you
feel you
isaac
we can only engage in such a way
which magnetises chains of pins
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
autonomy of learning
isaac newton
what do you mean
magnetisation/form
is this you as well
i understand
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
have you read
and the fake qualifier