i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

all that is to say

as in

its performative

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

not their contents

much more tactility

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

so the method has to be autonomous

propensity within someone

your feed looks like my tumblr

idk

lol yea

barren land

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

so an active mazelike process

its good short few pages

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

so at the end

or never left

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

Mon, 01 Dec 2025 23:38:15

send your tumblr

no i haven't really read anything

lol

what do you mean

feel you

that looks like my instagram account