there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

propensity within someone

the site i am dreaming

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

as in

i dont understand magnetisation

barren land

its good

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

which magnetises chains of pins

and the fake qualifier

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

send your tumblr

idk

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

its good short few pages

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

yeah

and the fake qualifier

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

whats your name?

so at the end

its good

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

sorry i am texting like a slav

i really havent

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate