Picture

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

propensity within someone

so the method has to be autonomous

we can only engage in such a way

ion

like magnets

god being the centre magnet

i have read not even 1 book

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

send your tumblr

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

yeah

feel you

fw

so at the end

its good

autonomy of learning

isaac

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i really havent

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i was tempted to lie about my name

its good

as in

sorry i am texting like a slav

no like which do people call me

or never left

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

He went in there with a camera to film it before he moved out of the building. He didn't think anyone would believe the story if he didn't have proof.

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate