its good

part of an old note. It will get lighter.

Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.

not so on: yvf(wthw)

all that is to say


mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation


division of reality is straying away from it

i really havent

confused - is it the tide or its absense? I still like where I was going with it. anyway, real reader know this site is the note.

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

was it worth it

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

you cannot feed someone truth

...

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

not their contents

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

its performative

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

so the method has to be autonomous

thank you

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

whats your name?

i love it here

what do you think my name is