my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
plato
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
what do you think my name is
propensity within someone
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
its performative
its good
ahnaf abrar
not their contents
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
plato
i love it here
feel you
i was tempted to lie about my name
is this you as well
i dont understand magnetisation
which magnetises chains of pins
have you read
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
yeah
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
division of reality is straying away from it
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
like magnets
like first name
brb i will read and reply sincerely