division of reality is straying away from it
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
we can only engage in such a way
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
sorry i am texting like a slav
plato
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
what do you mean
yeah
so the method has to be autonomous
isaac newton
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
god being the centre magnet
abrar?
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
magnetises a pin
i was tempted to lie about my name
no i haven't really read anything
send link
much more tactility
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
isaac
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
Can I see
its performative