there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
you cannot feed someone truth
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
its performative
send your tumblr
isaac
its good
your feed looks like my tumblr
i love it here
division of reality is straying away from it
ahnaf abrar
isaac newton
all that is to say
lol
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
autonomy of learning
feel you
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
magnetises a pin
bro i read nothing in my life
like magnets
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
not their contents
god being the centre magnet
something religious, a kind of complex,
it will get lighter
, something washing, cleansing, revealing, etc.