there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.


you cannot feed someone truth

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

its performative

send your tumblr

isaac

its good

your feed looks like my tumblr

i love it here

division of reality is straying away from it

ahnaf abrar

isaac newton

all that is to say

lol

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

autonomy of learning

feel you

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

magnetises a pin

what do you think my name is

bro i read nothing in my life

like magnets

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

not their contents

god being the centre magnet

something religious, a kind of complex,

it will get lighter

, something washing, cleansing, revealing, etc.

2 (actually index). two is company