i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
autonomy of learning
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
idk
lol
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
lol yea
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
or never left
as in
...
that looks like my instagram account
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
yeah
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
abrar?
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
like first name
no like which do people call me
Thank you, Jack