hello reader,
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
i dont understand magnetisation
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
feel you
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
ahnaf abrar
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
as in
its good
much more tactility
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
you cannot feed someone truth
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
sorry i am texting like a slav
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
plato
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
December 2025
fw
so at the end
i really havent
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
was it worth it
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
like first name