i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
its performative
autonomy of learning
lol
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
we can only engage in such a way
bro i read nothing in my life
much more tactility
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
i really havent
⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
not their contents
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
hello reader,
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.
fw
so at the end
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
the site i am dreaming
magnetisation/form
yeah